<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Towards a Theory of Yurtification</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ash10.com/2009/06/towards-a-theory-of-yurtification/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ash10.com/2009/06/towards-a-theory-of-yurtification/</link>
	<description>Pete Ashton helps you understand how the Internet works.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 18:10:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: James Rock</title>
		<link>http://ash10.com/2009/06/towards-a-theory-of-yurtification/#comment-10773</link>
		<dc:creator>James Rock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 11:24:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ash10.com/?p=463#comment-10773</guid>
		<description>great thinking.. 

I like this theory and use of the Yurt to describe it works so well.. it is also memorable so more people will recall it and use it in applying your theory in practice.

The rise of web 2.0 and social media is what has enable leaders of these platforms to become your position (2) and fast followers position (3). Unfortunately there are many laggards still in position (4) so perhaps your yurt isn&#039;t as big as you think yet?

What is clear, is that the leaders in the big media of newspapers, TV and magazines, currently in position (1) are very worried by how fast (2) and (3) are catching up..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>great thinking.. </p>
<p>I like this theory and use of the Yurt to describe it works so well.. it is also memorable so more people will recall it and use it in applying your theory in practice.</p>
<p>The rise of web 2.0 and social media is what has enable leaders of these platforms to become your position (2) and fast followers position (3). Unfortunately there are many laggards still in position (4) so perhaps your yurt isn&#8217;t as big as you think yet?</p>
<p>What is clear, is that the leaders in the big media of newspapers, TV and magazines, currently in position (1) are very worried by how fast (2) and (3) are catching up..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: william perrin</title>
		<link>http://ash10.com/2009/06/towards-a-theory-of-yurtification/#comment-10747</link>
		<dc:creator>william perrin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 12:31:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ash10.com/?p=463#comment-10747</guid>
		<description>good stuff pete

the underlying relationship between cost and potential audience reach is worth elucidating see my cod micro economics at

http://wperrin.blogspot.com/2009/06/audience-and-cost-curves-some-dull.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>good stuff pete</p>
<p>the underlying relationship between cost and potential audience reach is worth elucidating see my cod micro economics at</p>
<p><a href="http://wperrin.blogspot.com/2009/06/audience-and-cost-curves-some-dull.html" rel="nofollow">http://wperrin.blogspot.com/2009/06/audience-and-cost-curves-some-dull.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: philoko</title>
		<link>http://ash10.com/2009/06/towards-a-theory-of-yurtification/#comment-10743</link>
		<dc:creator>philoko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 11:06:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ash10.com/?p=463#comment-10743</guid>
		<description>How do you see the transition happening? Is it already?

Power Laws still seem consistent across blogging/tweeting. Any evidence to suggest otherwise?

Could you add some rough figures to the original Power Law graph for Mass Media? Newspapers have their circulation figures... how does someone like Stephen Fry or Charlie Brooker compare on Twitter? Where does slashdot fit in?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do you see the transition happening? Is it already?</p>
<p>Power Laws still seem consistent across blogging/tweeting. Any evidence to suggest otherwise?</p>
<p>Could you add some rough figures to the original Power Law graph for Mass Media? Newspapers have their circulation figures&#8230; how does someone like Stephen Fry or Charlie Brooker compare on Twitter? Where does slashdot fit in?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
