<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blogging as Social Processing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ash10.com/2009/06/blogging-as-social-processing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ash10.com/2009/06/blogging-as-social-processing/</link>
	<description>Pete Ashton helps you understand how the Internet works.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 18:10:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David Wilcox</title>
		<link>http://ash10.com/2009/06/blogging-as-social-processing/#comment-10668</link>
		<dc:creator>David Wilcox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 09:42:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ash10.com/?p=447#comment-10668</guid>
		<description>Thanks Pete, what an interesting thinking-in-progress piece that helped me reflect on why I blog. When I was a print journalist a long time ago there was something about &quot;people ought to know about this&quot; ... although I suspect it was more about the newsdesk might like it and other journalists might follow, supported by the illusion of a vast hungry readership.
As a blogger it&#039;s a bit different: there&#039;s no newsdesk, no &quot;guaranteed&quot; readership, and more response to be gained via Twitter.
So I think I&#039;m often blogging because I have a theme or storyline in mind, and there&#039;s an event, idea, connection I want to capture because it might be useful later. I&#039;m writing linkable stuff (for me) without quite knowing where I&#039;ll link back from. The best thing anyone said to me about my some posts I wote was &quot;I never know how your piece is going to end up&quot;. Nor do I ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Pete, what an interesting thinking-in-progress piece that helped me reflect on why I blog. When I was a print journalist a long time ago there was something about &#8220;people ought to know about this&#8221; &#8230; although I suspect it was more about the newsdesk might like it and other journalists might follow, supported by the illusion of a vast hungry readership.<br />
As a blogger it&#8217;s a bit different: there&#8217;s no newsdesk, no &#8220;guaranteed&#8221; readership, and more response to be gained via Twitter.<br />
So I think I&#8217;m often blogging because I have a theme or storyline in mind, and there&#8217;s an event, idea, connection I want to capture because it might be useful later. I&#8217;m writing linkable stuff (for me) without quite knowing where I&#8217;ll link back from. The best thing anyone said to me about my some posts I wote was &#8220;I never know how your piece is going to end up&#8221;. Nor do I &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Mabbett</title>
		<link>http://ash10.com/2009/06/blogging-as-social-processing/#comment-10646</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Mabbett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 18:27:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ash10.com/?p=447#comment-10646</guid>
		<description>No sooner did I say that, than recall that some people refer to a swan&#039;s feet as &quot;paddles&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No sooner did I say that, than recall that some people refer to a swan&#8217;s feet as &#8220;paddles&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Mabbett</title>
		<link>http://ash10.com/2009/06/blogging-as-social-processing/#comment-10645</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Mabbett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 18:24:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ash10.com/?p=447#comment-10645</guid>
		<description>My first thought when I saw your birds&#039; foot question on Twitter was the &quot;graceful swan&quot; analogy.

Their feet are &quot;palmate&quot; (adjective; per &#039;A Dictionary of Birds&#039;, Campbell &amp; Lack, Poyser, 1985, p.326). There is no specific noun.

Another small victory in my campaign to turn all Birmingham Social Media folk in to birders ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My first thought when I saw your birds&#8217; foot question on Twitter was the &#8220;graceful swan&#8221; analogy.</p>
<p>Their feet are &#8220;palmate&#8221; (adjective; per &#8216;A Dictionary of Birds&#8217;, Campbell &amp; Lack, Poyser, 1985, p.326). There is no specific noun.</p>
<p>Another small victory in my campaign to turn all Birmingham Social Media folk in to birders ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
