<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Collective Weather Mapping</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ash10.com/2009/02/collective-weather-mapping/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ash10.com/2009/02/collective-weather-mapping/</link>
	<description>Pete Ashton helps you understand how the Internet works.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 18:10:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Pete Ashton</title>
		<link>http://ash10.com/2009/02/collective-weather-mapping/#comment-591</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete Ashton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 19:06:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ash10.com/?p=225#comment-591</guid>
		<description>@Christopher: I&#039;d imagine it&#039;s just a one-off for weather. The novelty will soon fade. That&#039;s one reason why this isn&#039;t a sustainable replacement for journalism or whatnot. But I think these blurts of collective aggregation (or whatever you want to call them) are less interesting in themselves and more interesting as an illustration of what&#039;s going on underneath. This sort of thing happens on a much quieter level on Twitter all the time with impromptu gatherings and the like. This is big but it&#039;s the small that really matters. 

@Paul: Have updated the post accordingly. Since our Twitter networks appear to overlap a fair bit I expect we&#039;ll meet sometime soonish. Be good to chat!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Christopher: I&#8217;d imagine it&#8217;s just a one-off for weather. The novelty will soon fade. That&#8217;s one reason why this isn&#8217;t a sustainable replacement for journalism or whatnot. But I think these blurts of collective aggregation (or whatever you want to call them) are less interesting in themselves and more interesting as an illustration of what&#8217;s going on underneath. This sort of thing happens on a much quieter level on Twitter all the time with impromptu gatherings and the like. This is big but it&#8217;s the small that really matters. </p>
<p>@Paul: Have updated the post accordingly. Since our Twitter networks appear to overlap a fair bit I expect we&#8217;ll meet sometime soonish. Be good to chat!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher Woods</title>
		<link>http://ash10.com/2009/02/collective-weather-mapping/#comment-590</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Woods</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 18:53:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ash10.com/?p=225#comment-590</guid>
		<description>Interesting take on this - have to say I took part a little bit too, enjoying the notion of rating the snow quality :D

What you raise about how &#039;we&#039; own this data is particularly interesting - I wonder if the people who kickstarted the idea are also into the whole OSM project (which I&#039;ve helped out with a little tiny bit)... It seems like both could be helped along with a very similar mindset. I wonder if we&#039;ll see more user generated weather reports in the future - but primarily, I wonder if people will increasingly turn to aggregating the weather themselves? Or is this just a one-off?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting take on this &#8211; have to say I took part a little bit too, enjoying the notion of rating the snow quality :D</p>
<p>What you raise about how &#8216;we&#8217; own this data is particularly interesting &#8211; I wonder if the people who kickstarted the idea are also into the whole OSM project (which I&#8217;ve helped out with a little tiny bit)&#8230; It seems like both could be helped along with a very similar mindset. I wonder if we&#8217;ll see more user generated weather reports in the future &#8211; but primarily, I wonder if people will increasingly turn to aggregating the weather themselves? Or is this just a one-off?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Clarke</title>
		<link>http://ash10.com/2009/02/collective-weather-mapping/#comment-589</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Clarke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 18:37:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ash10.com/?p=225#comment-589</guid>
		<description>Love it - many similarities to how I saw it (writes another over-analyst). By Sunday night I had four checklist factors which I thought made the whole thing fly: see if you agree?

http://is.gd/i0wy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love it &#8211; many similarities to how I saw it (writes another over-analyst). By Sunday night I had four checklist factors which I thought made the whole thing fly: see if you agree?</p>
<p><a href="http://is.gd/i0wy" rel="nofollow">http://is.gd/i0wy</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
