<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Two points about the alleged &#8220;death of blogging&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ash10.com/2008/10/two-points-about-the-alleged-death-of-blogging/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ash10.com/2008/10/two-points-about-the-alleged-death-of-blogging/</link>
	<description>Pete Ashton shows you how the Internet works and helps you use it better.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 23:31:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susi O'Neill</title>
		<link>http://ash10.com/2008/10/two-points-about-the-alleged-death-of-blogging/#comment-149</link>
		<dc:creator>Susi O'Neill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 23:55:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ash10.com/?p=49#comment-149</guid>
		<description>What you gotta learn is that the &#039;old media&#039; love fads - building em up, the breakin&#039; em down.  Blogging was their favourite fad actually in 2007 - but now it&#039;s &quot;so 2004&quot;.  

There was a very amusing discussion on Radio 4&#039;s Today programme this morning, where John Humphreys totally ripped the p**s out of a couple of lame-ass journo bloggers (one of whom claimed &quot;I like to tell the world about my sick cat&quot;), commenting on this story.  He sounded incredulous at the idea of Twittering and &#039;tweets&#039; and blamed it on the deficit of human attention spans in a derogratory way that only he could get away with.  Not sure home tongue-in-cheek it all was but worth checking out if you can. 

As you say, it&#039;s not about the what but about the who and the why - there are as many reasons to write (whether you call it blogging or whatever) as there are writers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What you gotta learn is that the &#8216;old media&#8217; love fads &#8211; building em up, the breakin&#8217; em down.  Blogging was their favourite fad actually in 2007 &#8211; but now it&#8217;s &#8220;so 2004&#8243;.  </p>
<p>There was a very amusing discussion on Radio 4&#8242;s Today programme this morning, where John Humphreys totally ripped the p**s out of a couple of lame-ass journo bloggers (one of whom claimed &#8220;I like to tell the world about my sick cat&#8221;), commenting on this story.  He sounded incredulous at the idea of Twittering and &#8216;tweets&#8217; and blamed it on the deficit of human attention spans in a derogratory way that only he could get away with.  Not sure home tongue-in-cheek it all was but worth checking out if you can. </p>
<p>As you say, it&#8217;s not about the what but about the who and the why &#8211; there are as many reasons to write (whether you call it blogging or whatever) as there are writers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brenda</title>
		<link>http://ash10.com/2008/10/two-points-about-the-alleged-death-of-blogging/#comment-148</link>
		<dc:creator>brenda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 21:14:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ash10.com/?p=49#comment-148</guid>
		<description>Yes. Love that deep space illustration.

The ones that all talk about monetization are several gazillion light years away from my little cosy sphere of influence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes. Love that deep space illustration.</p>
<p>The ones that all talk about monetization are several gazillion light years away from my little cosy sphere of influence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jo Ind</title>
		<link>http://ash10.com/2008/10/two-points-about-the-alleged-death-of-blogging/#comment-147</link>
		<dc:creator>Jo Ind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 11:51:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ash10.com/?p=49#comment-147</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know whether this is obvious or not, but I do know you said it SO well.  Great use of illustration.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know whether this is obvious or not, but I do know you said it SO well.  Great use of illustration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
